What is a building safety case?
A building safety case is the structured body of information that demonstrates how building safety risks are understood, managed and kept under review in a higher-risk building.
Read the full answerBuilding Safety Case FAQs
The questions we are asked most often by Accountable Persons, building safety managers and consultants — covering safety cases, evidence, risk assessment, software and AI.
55 questions answered
What a safety case is, who is responsible, what it should contain and how it is kept current.
A building safety case is the structured body of information that demonstrates how building safety risks are understood, managed and kept under review in a higher-risk building.
Read the full answerA building safety case report summarises the key information from the building safety case and explains how the Principal Accountable Person is managing building safety risks.
Read the full answerIn England, safety case duties apply to occupied higher-risk buildings within the scope of the Building Safety Act 2022.
Read the full answerLegal responsibility sits with the Accountable Persons, with the Principal Accountable Person holding specific responsibilities for the safety case report and Building Assessment Certificate process.
Read the full answerA good building safety case should explain the building, its relevant hazards and how the risks of fire spread and structural failure are being managed.
Read the full answerA safety case report should provide a clear and proportionate explanation of the building safety risks and how they are being managed.
Read the full answerEffective risk management requires more than identifying that a control exists — the Accountable Person needs confidence that important controls actually work.
Read the full answerA good safety case report demonstrates that the Principal Accountable Person understands the major safety risks and has taken all reasonable steps to manage them.
Read the full answerA good safety case report is building-specific, evidence-led and risk-based. It brings information together to show how risks are understood and controlled.
Read the full answerThe Building Safety Regulator publishes detailed criteria used to assess Building Assessment Certificate applications across regulatory, fire and structural disciplines.
Read the full answerThere is no simple pass-fail checklist that guarantees a Building Assessment Certificate, but the BSR publishes the criteria its teams use.
Read the full answerThe most common weakness is treating the safety case as a compliance report rather than a risk management argument.
Read the full answerA safety case can contain a lot of information but still fail to demonstrate that the Principal Accountable Person understands and is managing the building's safety risks.
Read the full answerA Request for Information does not necessarily mean the building is unsafe. It may mean the submitted information does not allow the regulator to reach the necessary judgement.
Read the full answerA report that does not adequately demonstrate how building safety risks are managed may lead to requests for further information or contribute to a Building Assessment Certificate application being refused.
Read the full answerNot necessarily. Many higher-risk buildings pre-date current standards, and the BSR assessment considers whether additional reasonable steps are proportionate.
Read the full answerOutstanding actions do not automatically make a safety case inadequate. The key is whether they are understood and appropriately managed.
Read the full answerA safety case should be kept under continuous review rather than updated only when the regulator requests it.
Read the full answerA live building safety case changes as the building, evidence and understanding of risk change.
Read the full answerA pre-submission review should test the report against the BSR assessment criteria and ask whether the evidence actually supports the conclusions.
Read the full answerAn existing safety case report rarely needs rewriting from scratch — the priority is improving the underlying safety case.
Read the full answerThere is no standard timescale — it depends on building complexity, information quality and how well the risks are already understood.
Read the full answerConsultancy fees are only part of the cost — surveys, staff time, RFIs and rework often matter more.
Read the full answerAI can support safety case quality assurance, but it should not replace competent professional judgement or the responsibilities of the Principal Accountable Person.
Read the full answerA general-purpose AI tool can help with drafting and summarising, but a meaningful pre-submission check needs to assess the report systematically against BSR criteria.
Read the full answerSafety case reports can be independently reviewed by competent building safety, fire and structural professionals. Cascade Verify provides a rapid AI-assisted pre-submission check.
Read the full answerYes. A pre-submission review can identify issues that are much easier to resolve before the application reaches the regulator.
Read the full answerA review usually considers whether the report is complete, coherent and evidence-led. An audit may go further by independently testing underlying evidence and processes.
Read the full answerNo. No independent reviewer or AI tool can guarantee that the Building Safety Regulator will issue a Building Assessment Certificate.
Read the full answerWhat the certificate process involves, what the regulator looks for and what it does — and does not — prove.
A BAC is issued by the Building Safety Regulator following its assessment of how building safety duties are being met.
Read the full answerThe regulator needs enough information to assess whether the building safety duties are being met, with the safety case report at its core.
Read the full answerYes — but the response should address the underlying risk and evidence issues, not just reword the report.
Read the full answerIt concentrates effort, evidence and scrutiny on the risks that matter most to the safety of that particular building.
Read the full answerNo. A certificate is a regulatory milestone, not a guarantee — building safety risk must still be managed continuously.
Read the full answerHow to respond to Requests for Information (RFIs) and Prompt Remedy Notices (PRNs) from the Building Safety Regulator.
Start by identifying what the BSR is asking you to demonstrate. An RFI is not a request for more documents — it is a regulatory question that needs a clear, risk-based answer.
Read the full answerNo. An RFI is a request for further information or clarification. It does not necessarily mean the building is unsafe or that the safety case will be refused.
Read the full answerNot necessarily. First establish whether evidence is genuinely missing, or whether the safety case has simply failed to explain the evidence that already exists.
Read the full answerA PRN is issued where the BSR wants a particular issue addressed. It usually relates to a building feature where the safety case has not adequately explained the associated risk.
Read the full answerTreat a PRN as a risk question, not a request for more narrative. Identify the feature, the credible failure scenarios, the consequences, the controls and the evidence behind them.
Read the full answerDo not just describe the feature. A description tells the regulator what is there; a risk assessment explains why it matters.
Read the full answerBe transparent. A safety case does not become stronger by disguising uncertainty. Explain what is unknown, why it matters, what is known, current controls and the planned programme.
Read the full answerNot necessarily. The important questions are why the survey is required, what uncertainty it resolves, how significant that uncertainty is, and whether the risk is adequately managed while the work remains outstanding.
Read the full answerTest whether you have answered the underlying risk question, not whether you have added more text. Check understanding, evidence, uncertainty, interim measures and consistency.
Read the full answerMethods for understanding building safety risk and judging whether controls actually work.
Bowtie analysis is a visual risk assessment method that shows how an unwanted event could occur and how its consequences are prevented or mitigated.
Read the full answerBowtie analysis helps building owners move from describing safety measures to understanding how those measures contribute to risk reduction.
Read the full answerControl effectiveness should consider whether the control is appropriate for the risk, correctly implemented and working as intended.
Read the full answerThe organisational arrangements and measures that keep building safety risk under control.
A Safety Management System provides the organisational arrangements used to manage building safety risks through the life of the building.
Read the full answerLeading indicators are measures that provide warning that safety performance may be deteriorating before a serious incident occurs.
Read the full answerHow specialist software supports safety case information and portfolio oversight.
Building safety case software is specialist software used to structure, maintain and provide assurance over the information that supports a building safety case.
Read the full answerWord works for producing a report, but it becomes harder to manage when the underlying safety case changes frequently or involves large amounts of evidence and multiple contributors.
Read the full answerYes. Portfolio-level safety case software can provide oversight across multiple higher-risk buildings while retaining the detailed safety case for each individual building.
Read the full answerWhere AI genuinely helps building safety professionals — and where it should not decide.
AI can assist with preparing a building safety case, but it should not replace competent professional judgement or make building safety risk decisions on behalf of the Accountable Person.
Read the full answerAI can reduce some of the administrative burden involved in reviewing large volumes of building information.
Read the full answerHow Cascade supports live safety case management, including existing reports.
Cascade is a specialist building safety risk and safety case management platform that connects the information used to understand, demonstrate and manage building safety risk.
Read the full answerYes. You do not need to start your safety case again simply because it was originally produced in Word or by an external consultant.
Read the full answerBuilding safety legislation, regulation and Building Safety Regulator guidance can change. This page is general information, not legal advice — always refer to current legislation and official guidance for your building.
Cascade connects building information, risk arguments, evidence, deficiencies and actions so you always know where your buildings stand.